Last week I discussed general information about "America's printmakers," Currier & Ives. Today I'll look at some different aspects of their prints and collectors of them. (Find more at PPS-West.com)
Maps seem to attract a lot of collectors, more so than do prints. There are collectors for important historical figures, such as Washington and Lincoln, and historical events, such as the American Revolution or Presidential elections, but most prints are purchased more on a one time basis rather than as part of a collection. Besides historical prints, the one type of print that is collected more than any other are those by Currier & Ives. Currier & Ives have been collected ever since the early twentieth century and today there are still many people who collect these wonderful images of nineteenth century America.
I have talked about "value ranking" for different types of prints and there is definitely a ranking of values for different sorts of Currier & Ives prints. In general, the most valuable are winter scenes, followed closely by railroad prints. Other popular subjects are hunting & fishing, sporting, steamships, and western. City views bring a lot of money, but this is more because of collectors of the cities shown rather than because of Currier & Ives collectors. There is a big difference in price between one of the prints in these popular subjects (a large folio print can go in the tens of thousands of dollars) and a less desirable subject (some large folio subjects sell in the hundreds).
There is also a big difference in price for Currier & Ives prints based on condition. As discussed in previous blogs, one of the thing that makes a collector is the use of criteria and Currier & Ives collectors are generally real sticklers for condition. A print with any sort of condition issue, especially if a subject sought by collectors, will sell for much less than one in excellent condition. A small folio railroad print in fine condition will sell for over $2,000, whereas one with tears or faded color will not sell at all to serious collectors and so will sell for much less to when it does sell.
One of the "peculiar" things about Currier & Ives collectors is that many of them are very focused on margins. One can find Currier & Ives prints with big margins, but the majority have been trimmed down from their "full sheets" over the years, usually in order to fit into a frame. Some collectors will not even consider a Currier & Ives print, no matter how good condition it is otherwise, unless it has "large" margins. There is a story that a collector drove for hours to go see a top Currier & Ives because the owner told him it had large margins and was in great shape, but when the collector got to the owner's house he found that it was a reproduction, only about half the size of the original. The collector hadn't bothered to ask what size the print was, only how big the margins were!
I think you can probably tell from my tone that I am not a believer in this focus. Yes, there is no question that all other things being equal, a Currier & Ives print with big margins is better than one with smaller margins. Also, one certainly doesn't want the print trimmed so that some of the imprint is cut off and I do think one wants to have at least some margin all around so that the print can be put into a frame without the mat or frame bevel coming right up to the image. However, as long as there are reasonable margins around the image (say about 1/2 inch) I don't think a collector should be too bothered about the size of the margins.
The reason for this is that the margins are not something that has any essential meaning to the prints. That is, there is no historical significance to the margins and in fact trimmed margins are more a part of the actual history of Currier & Ives prints than big margins. Currier & Ives themselves sold prints in their shop with the option of buying them framed. If you went into their shop and picked out a print and a frame, they would immediately cut down the print to fit into the frame. I have never seen a clearly "period" framing job on a Currier & Ives print which had large margins. This just wasn't how people framed Currier & Ives prints. All the historic evidence we have, from existing period-framed prints or from images in prints like that above, indicates that when Currier & Ives prints were framed at the time, they were put in frames with little or no margins.
The margins these prints had before trimming was just based on what paper the firm was using; it was not something they put on the prints intentionally. I guess the bottom line for me is that if prints with trimmed margins (within reason) are what people at the time generally had and this was good enough for Currier & Ives themselves, then it is good enough for me. (Sorry about this rant, but this is a basic disagreement I have with a number of Currier & Ives collectors).
Another thing that is peculiar to these prints is that lists have been made of the "Best 50" Currier & Ives prints (out of about 8,000 different images!) In 1932 a jury of twelve Currier & Ives experts and collectors selected a group of what they considered to be the "Best 50" large folio Currier & Ives prints. For fifty days running, these prints were illustrated and described in the New York Sun. This publicity created much interest, and subsequent newspaper sales, so that the following year the "Best 50" small folio prints were also selected (four medium folio prints were included in this list). These two lists created an instant market for the 100 prints chosen and the lists have been reprinted in many Currier & Ives books since.
In 1988 a new, more democratic process of selecting the "Best 50" was sponsored by the American Historical Print Collectors Society (AHPCS). "The Best 50 - Revisited" was begun by a panel of experts who selected the "Top 100" of both large and small folio prints. These prints were then presented in a ballot to the entire membership of the AHPCS, which then selected the "New Best 50" large and small folio prints. A handsome book, Currier & Ives. The New Best 50 was published in 1990 with all the new "best" prints illustrated in color and with an analysis of the differences between the original and new lists.
The prints from all four lists are all wonderful prints, generally considered to be the best of the Currier & Ives oeuvre. They are very collectible and usually command a premium price. If someone wants to collect Currier & Ives and doesn't want to pay such a premium, there are, of course, many other types of Currier & Ives prints to collect. There are many fun subjects (children, barnyard animals, kittens and dogs, etc.) which one could collect without having to pay absolutely top dollar. Any Currier & Ives in good condition will sell for a fair amount, but if you spend a bit of time looking around, you can find ways to collect these wonderful prints without spending a fortune.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Story of Harness Racing collection by Currier & Ives will be on display at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library May 3, 2010 – August 31, 2010 Monday thru Friday. Come and see!
ReplyDeleteWhere can I find information on the currier & ives print "the old farm gate"?
ReplyDeleteBecause the firm issued over 7,000 different prints, there is little to say about any particular image. For some of their prints there is an artist, and some have a unique history, but for most all you can say about them is the general information about the firm, which you can read about in this blog.
ReplyDeleteIf you wish to research your print on your own, there are a couple of volumes which list most of the over 7,000 prints issued by N. Currier and Currier & Ives. Both of these books contain details of title, size, and so forth and are very useful. Both books are out of print, but can sometimes be found on the market and they are also often found in a good library. These volumes are: Frederic A. Conningham, updated by Colin Simkin. Currier & Ives Prints. An Illustrated Check List and Gale Research Currier & Ives, A Catalogue Raisonne.
I have an American homestead spring dated 1868.nobody seems to know about it. Everyone I asked keep tellen me it should be dated 1869
DeleteI have what I think is an original print. Subject is a sleigh scene, two horses, man and a woman in sled, signed and imprinted on the bottom left corner, artist Otis Knirsch. can anyone tell me about this. I fits all the descriptions of evaluating authenticity of Currier & Ives prints.
ReplyDeletei have 4 season pics of currier&Lves american homesteam with the act of congress in the year 1868 how much do you i can get for all for
ReplyDeleteThis is not really the forum to be discussing values of prints, other in general terms. The real question is whether your prints are originals. There is a good chance they are not as this is a popular subject used for many reproductions.
ReplyDeletei have a question i have 3 pictures of currier and ives 1 is spring at the homestead s189 the second is winter in the country s 191 and harvest s188 these pictures are like hologram they are gold and also look 3d i want to know if these are worth anything i got the at and estate sale thanks
ReplyDeleteThese are reproductions, and like all reproductions, have only "decorative" value.
ReplyDeleteMy aunt has an old Currier & Ives. She said that it is "the way of the Cross" and described it as looking through a window. I did not see the picture but my aunt is 92 years old; so, I'm sure the picture is old too. Any idea what it might be or how I can find info on it?
ReplyDeleteIf you read the queries above, you should find the answer to your question.
ReplyDeleteI have a book titled "Currier and Ives America" edited by Colin Simkin. On the title page it reads "A panorama of the mid-nineteenth century scene. Eighty choice prints in full color with extended commentary on the prints and the times which they portray. Can you let me know what it is worth? The pictures are in mint condition however the cover page and binding is loose. thank you
ReplyDeleteHello Sir,
ReplyDeleteI purchased a print today and if you would be so kind to let me know if this print is a original please?
Here is the information:
On the back of the frame paper:
Academy Arts
820 N. Orleans Street
Chicago, Il. 60810
Division of Intercraft Industries Corp.
Style #8678N
Finish Walnut
Made in USA
I took the back paper off and on the back of the print itself is the following information:
(Left bottom corner)
Dufex Prints- printed in England
S189
Please let me know your thoughts and thanks so much for your time.
Hello there,
I purchased a print today. I would like to get your opinion if it is a original. her is the information:
On hte back of the frame is the following:
Currier and Ives 6x8 foil print
Academy Arts
820 N. Orleans Street
Chicago, Il. 60810
Division of Intercraft Industries Corp.
Style #8678N
Finish Walnut
made in USA
I took the back off of the frame and the following information was listed on the print itself:
Dufex Prints
printed in England
S189
Please let me know your thoughts and thanks so much
e-mail:
pami@hawkeyefoodservice.com
What did you find out, I have a gold foil"in the country"with that same print in England stamp are these old or new work
DeleteMy neighbor is 86 and a retired printer. He has asked me to help him sell his corrier & ives lithographs. He has ALOT how would I start this process?
ReplyDeleteThis is really not the place to be asking about selling prints. I try to keep this blog as non-commercial as possible. Please have your friend call us at our phone number 215-242-4750.
ReplyDeleteHi Chris,
ReplyDeleteMine say "published by Currier & Ives," in the bottom left corner. Does that make them reproductions?
If all it says in "published by Currier & Ives" then, yes, it is definitely a reproduction. There was always more information than that on an original C&I print.
ReplyDeleteHi Chris
ReplyDeleteI have a book
Currier and Ives
Printmakers to the American People
by Harry T. Peters
Doubleday, Doran & Co., Inc.
Garden City, New York MCMXLII
This Special Edition of Currier & Ives
is et in 12 pt. Caslon Monotype with hand-drawn decorative intials The design and typography is by a.p. Tedesco and the book has been produced by Zeese-Wilkinson Company, Inc. and H. Wolff Book Manufacturing Company.
Copyright 1942,by Harry T. Peters
this book appears to be copies of prints
Any comment of this book would be helpful.
This is a typical C&I reference books, of which there are many. As the prints are so popular, some of these books are very nicely done--as is this one, but it is not something that has a lot of value. If you look on-line for book sellers, I am fairly sure you'll find a number of these for sale. You can try, for instance, www.bookfinder.com It is something to be enjoyed, but not worried about in terms of value.
ReplyDeleteIn a box lot of items I purchased at an auction today I found a cardboard mailing tube (about 12 inches long) with a Currier & Ives print rolled up inside, excellent condition, three 1/2 cent stamps on the outside of the mailing tube, mailing label looks old, says "White's Quaint Shop," Westfield, Massachusetts, name typed on label (mailed to:) Poulah Chandler, Bartlett NH; at the bottom of the label it says "Here's Your Gift" Print is about 8 by 10, "The Old Farm House;" beneath the image, left side, it says "Published by Currier & Ives;" on the right side it says "125 Nassau Street"' and in the middle it says "Entered according to act of Congress in the year 1872 by Currier & Ives in the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington." Does this sound like the real thing?
ReplyDeleteNo, this is a reproduction. C&I prints were not issued this way, but as flat, separate prints in the 19th century. Many, many firms made reproductions and issued them in many different formats. That doesn't mean they are not nice prints, for they can be very decorative, but they are not "the real thing."
Deletehello, i have three currier and ives lithographs,..New York. one is the first trot of the season The Bettmann Archives. I have had these for about 25 years and i purchased them from a yard sale. curious as to the value.
DeleteI have 2 6x 8 foil pictures in their original frames. Style # 6663 Finish Map/BLK another number 666. These were my mothers. Made by Intercraft Industries Corp. 1840 N. Clybourn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60614. Are they of any value?
ReplyDeleteI have the same print #6663. Did u ever get any answers? love to know.
DeleteAny prints like this that are reproductions of C&I prints have only "decorative" value. That is, they are worth what they look like as decorative items. They have no collector value.
DeleteI acquired the print or painting "Found" with the same address on the back, but the company was called Art Crest.
DeleteI would like to know if my print is the orginal or reproduction. My mother was born in 1926 and always had this tin can. It has a winter scence with people skating:
ReplyDeleteEarly Winter
Lithograph by Currier & Ives, 1869
The Harry T Peter's Collection, Museum of the City of New York
P3224
It has numbers stamped on the bottom of the can.
Do you have any knowledge of this can?
Thank you
I have two prints that have been on my mothers wall since I was a boy.I am 43 now. One of a boy sitting on beach looking at the ocean and the other of a girl standing on the beach pointing at the sky.Prints are by Academy Arts. STYLE(6982),SUBJECT(Juveniles)I was wondering what the worth is or where I might find more information on them.Any information would be greatly appreciated. these prints are in mint condition. Thanks Paul
ReplyDeletei just came across a print of Currier and Ives "The Life of a Hunter - A Tight Fix". I noticed it behind a portait I found of my father. My father was 19 when the picture was taken 1932 so i am assuming it has been there ever since the picture was framed. It is in very good condition with slight paper discoloration (from age I suppose). Any idea what something like this would be worth? Thanks - PFA
ReplyDeleteMy bet is that this is a reproduction and not an original. Two reasons for this; first, this is a rare print (at least the original is) and there are quite a number of reproductions of it. Secondly, if it was behind another print, then it is likely the wrong size. The original is about 19 x 27 1/2 inches and that is so large it is somewhat hard to imagine it behind another print. If your print is the large size, then it could be an original and would have some significant value. If a reproduction, then it has only "decorative" value.
ReplyDeleteI have the 4 print set of the american homestead Winter, Spring, Summer, and Autumn.
ReplyDeleteThe paper on the back of each is numbered 2054.
I have had them for year and below the photo of each prints read exactly as follows on each.
Left: PUBD BY CURRIERS & IVES
Center: Entered according to Act of Congress A) 1869, by Currier & Ives, in the Clerks Officeof the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
Right: 152 NASSAU ST.N.Y.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI received a small Currier print from my great aunt after she passed. She had it for at least 70 years. They were very well off so i don't think it is repo? It says in left hand side LITH, & PUB. BY N. CURRIER, in the middle THE CARRIER DOVE> The Departure 350. on the right side 152 NASSAU ST. COR of SPRUCE, NY
I have looked up this print only to be disappointed because the image does not match mine. Mine has 2 girls the smaller is looking at the viewer and has a royal blue dress and yellow sash the bigger is holding a dove with a little envelope around it's neck she has a pale pink dress and teal? sash blue/green bird. it is in a very primative frame with newspaper behind it. could you please help me identify it?
Currier & Ives did a number of prints with this title, so the fact that your print does not match the one you found on line does not mean it is not an original. As long as it is about the right size (9 x 12) and is a lithograph, it probably is an original.
ReplyDeleteI recently bought a C&I print. The print is called "The Three Jolly Kittens" with a subtitle "At the Feast". After doing a Google search on this print, I realized it was possible that I had a reproduction. The contrasting print was called "The Three Greedy Kittens" with a subtitle "At the Feast" Secondly, the colors of the tablecloth are not the same, as well as, the liquid in the cup and lastly the bottles are labeled differently. The subject and overall design are alike; however, my print has a different title and some color variations. Could this be a popular series produced in different colors or a re-strike?
ReplyDeleteC&I did a whole bunch of different kitten prints, some with similar but different compositions. Also, each print was hand colored and they were done over a period of years, so different coloring doesn't mean that yours is a reproduction. To know that, you have to see if it is a hand colored lithograph printed on 19th century paper.
Deletei have a 9x12 wild turkey shooting reprinted lith by currier ives 1871 is it anything
ReplyDeleteI inherited 4 Currier and Ives lithographs. Three I have determined to be reproductions. "Champions of the River", Wooding up on the River" & "Midnight race on the Mississippi". I have a large "Midnight Race on the Mississippi" that interests me. it has "sketch of Natchez by H.D.Manning" in bottom left,"lithograph of Currier and Ives" in right corner. Published by Currier and Ives 152 Nassua St. in middle. Fine print under pic states "Entered according to Act of Congress in yr 1860 by Currier and Ives...". Looking for a clue if real or not or how else anovice can tell?...Thanks
ReplyDeleteNo original C&I print says "lithograph of Currier and Ives." Thus this must be a reproduction.
DeleteActually Chris, the 1852 Currier lithograph, Mrs Fish And The Misses Fox" says "LITH AND PUB" by N.Currier" - check it out!
DeleteI HAVE A PRINT,,,THE ROAD SIDE MILL,,ENTRIEDACORDINGTO THE ACT OF CONGRESS IN THE YEAR 1870 BY COURIER AN IVES IN THE CLERKS OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK...IS IT AN ORIGINAL
ReplyDeleteNo way we can tell from that information. If you go to our web site to the Currier & Ives section, we have a page which answers questions and gives clues on how you can tell.
DeleteI have a Blish style 7405& can you tell the date and value?
DeleteI have a few prints (from the 50's or 60's) of Currier & Ives on the back they all have articles of what the print itself is all about. made in U.S.A.
ReplyDeleteAre they from a Calendar or what?
Hi Chris,I have 3 of the American homestead print that read the following along the bottom: Published by Currier & Ives,
ReplyDeleteEntered according to Act of Congress A 1869, by Currier & Ives, in the Clerks Office of the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of New York. 152 Nassau St. New York
Could these be authentic? I have someone interested in them and want to offer a fair price.
Many reproductions of the C&I prints have exactly the same printed information as the originals. The only way you can tell what you have is by size and the printing process. If you go to the Philadelphia Print Shop web site and look up our section on Currier & Ives, we give more information on how you can tell what you have.
DeleteHi - I have what seems to be an unusual set of "Four Seasons" Currier & Ives prints. Each print is of the head and shoulders of a young lady, with each of the four ladies in a different costume. At the bottom each is titled i.e. "Summer", "Autumn", "Winter", "Spring". Also below the each picture in very small print is the line "Published according to Act of Congress of the year 1870, by Currier & Ives in the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington". Below that is the title, then below that the line "Published by Currier & Ives 125 Nassau St. New York". All text is in capitals.
ReplyDeleteI can't find any reference to this set on the web, searching on "four seasons" and other obvious keywords. Does the set have a standard name? Would you say it is rare or commonplace, or maybe a reproduction?
Thanks for any info.
This is a fairly standard set of C&I prints. In some series the firm put a series name in the title (e.g. American Homestead), but not always. There is no standard name for the series, though they are often called the Four Seasons.
DeleteA little more info after reading your website: the pictures of the girls themselves, not counting any margin, are 9" wide by 12" tall. The basic black & white pictures are made up of streams and swirls of tiny black and gray speckles. These were then evidently stencil-colored (wide swaths of color applied inexactly). I don't want to unframe them to feel of the paper, but they umm... look old...
ReplyDeleteThanks again for any info
From your description, these do sound like they are originals. I have not seen reproductions of this set, though such might exist. Still, I think the odds are you have originals.
DeleteThanks for the information, it was very helpful.
DeleteI bought a print entitled "A view of New London, Connecticut from the River Road, Currier & Ives. The print is lightly colored. Under the image on the left is I Sherman 10. I can't find this print listed anywhere-do you have any information about it?
DeleteThank you for any info. dsg
There is no Currier print listed with this title and the name "I. Sherman" is not one that appears on any original Currier & Ives prints I have seen. I suspect you have a reproduction of a Currier & Ives print. Esp. true if "Currier & Ives" appears in the title of the print itself, as they never put their name in the titles.
DeleteThanks for your answer. Although I may have mislead you--Currier & Ives is listed underneath the title. I didn't think it was an original, but possibly a calendar print. Since I have a summer house in New London, I couldn't not purchase it!
DeleteHi Chris,
ReplyDeleteDo you know when the first lithographs were transposed on ceramics or pottery? My name is Steve and I unearthed approximately 80 antique bottles in a seam of old household basements that had been buried many years prior to my discovery in the mid 1970s. These bottles were boxed up during one of my major moves in 1988 and I opened the box three weeks ago for the first time since 1988. The bottles have been traced now to the mid 1800's up to approximately mid 1905. My story is somewhat interesting in that I need clarification as to whether it is a coincidence or if these were from that timeframe. I have yet to find this item or information about them anywhere on the internet. I have two beer steins that have Currier & Ives lithographs on them. The only writing on them is, "American Homestead Summer""Currier & Ives" and "Winter in the Country - The Old Grist Mill" "Currier & Ives". I can't recall finding these Currier & Ives steins in the mid 1970's in our dig but I find it interesting that I boxed the steins in with the bottles in 1988 and the prints were originally from 1862 and 1868. I have pictures of these steins if you might like to see them.
The images on the steins are not 19th century. At no time were C&I prints used on pottery or ceramics in the 19th century. They became popular in the 20th century and that is when they started using reproduction images of C&I prints on various things like steins, plates, etc.
DeleteHello, we have 2 prints that seem to be nice quality reproductions of Currier & Ives lithographs. One is titled "Winter in the Country. Getting Ice" (1864), and the other is titled "Frozen Up" (1872). Both are marked "Folio #23" in the lower left corners. Both are large (18"x 13") and the second has a note attached to the back pointing out the artist is unknown and the print is "From the famous collection of Harry T. Peters, Esq., and reproduced through his courtesy." Can you tell me anything about these?
ReplyDeleteThere really isn't anything much to tell you besides what you know already. All reproductions have basically the same story--they are photomechanically made prints intended for decoration. No reproductions of C&I prints have "collectors" value. Their value is purely decorative and it just depends on how well they are made for how much they are worth. There are all sorts of different processes used, but as we do not deal with reproductions we are not really knowledgeable about that. The best thing to do with C&I reproductions, assuming you like them, is to frame them, hang them up and enjoy them.
DeleteThanks for the quick reply. I do see now that Harry T. Peters had a big C&I collection which is now at the National Museum of American History and at the Museum of the City of New York. I'll go frame 'em this weekend and enjoy them at our cabin. Thanks, again.
DeleteHello, I picked up a pretty picture thrifting the other day and decided to do some research. This picture's face is hard and the picture is carved in and there's color. It's Winter Country - the Old Grist Mill and has the name "Currier & Ives" in the bottom left corner. On the back, it has an old sticker from Fine arts gallery, Inc. 2 e Lancaster Ave, Ardmore PA 19003. I can't seem to find any information about hard pieces and was wondering if you could give any info. Thanks for your help!
ReplyDeleteCurrier & Ives prints have long been popular and many firms have made various types of reproductions or objects based on their images. Your picture has no real connection with the Currier & Ives firm other than the maker used their image to make it. I am sure it is nice, but it is not an original Currier & Ives.
DeleteIve recently come across two prints that seem to meet all the requirements of an original as far as i can tell.However both prints are black and white and Im haveing a terrible time finding these prints not in color im wondering if that makes them less likely to be originals however they came out of my grandmothers basement who just passed away at age 100 1/2 , she lived in the house for just over 97 yrs and got rid of nothing. they certainlly dont look like they have been moved in many many years. as i said .....everything else seems right. the title on one is "George M Patchen, Brown Dick and Millers Damsel" in their slendid trotting contest for a purse of $500 dated 1859 the other s title iis " a Race for blood!"copyrighted 1890 (again ...i can find this image but not in black and white ???? Can you tell me any further info on black and white prints ???/ thanks so much
ReplyDeleteYour query raises a number of issues about which you should be clear. First is that the fact you cannot find a print in a particular mode does not mean a whole lot. That is, I am assuming you have primarily checked on the internet. You have to remember that C&I issued at least 8,000 prints and only a fraction of that number are ever put up on the web, especially if you consider different formats. A lot of people think that the internet contains all the information (or at least most) on prints there is, but it really only has a small fraction of the world of prints. So not finding something on the web does not really mean a whole lot.
DeleteThe second thing is that Currier & Ives often issued their prints both colored and uncolored. So the fact that you found only colored ones does not, in and of itself, mean much.
However, that being said, I think in your case it does mean that they are reproductions. Both of the prints you mention were issued only in the large folio size. That means that their images are about 17 1/2 x 27 1/2. My bet is that your prints are considerably smaller than this. I say this because I have never seen one of the large folio C&I horse prints issued in b&w, but I have often seen reproductions of them b&w.
Now if your prints are the right size, then they still could be originals, but my guess is that they are considerably smaller and thus reproductions.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThese are not original Currier & Ives prints as none of them are foil prints. This is some sort of reproductive series, of which there are very many. The value of any reproductive Currier & Ives print just depends on their appearance as they have only "decorative" value.
DeleteHello um Chris Lane i have a question about a picture by Eric Sloane Quality 2483 DI Wal Red Velvet size 24 by 48
ReplyDeleteHey Chris Happy Thanksgiving to you. i recently found 4 AMERICAN HOMESTEAD (seasons Spring,Summer,Autumn, and Winter.) They are all 4 framed and have the titles on the bottome as follows.Currier & Ives Lithograph, New York in the left hand bottom corner AMERICAN HOMESTEAD AUTUMN (the same for each of the other 3 seasons) in the middle and Museum Of The City Of New York in the bottome right hand corner.They are Black and White with little bits of color all throughout the pictures. The paper is a little thick with a grainey sort of texture to it although I dont have a magnifying glass yet to view them with do you think these are possibly origianl reproductions and are they of any value? Thank you very much, sincerely Donna
ReplyDeleteIt makes sense that they are original reproductions by the Museum of City of New York, but whether a print is an "original" reproduction or a reproduction of a reproduction doesn't really matter. All reproductions have the same sort of value, which is "decorative" only. The only difference it makes is whether they are original Currier & Ives prints, done in the 19th century. Any reproduction is simply a copy. They may be nice, but their value is simply in how they look; they have no collectors value. Unfortunately, there are lots and lots of C&I reproductions, so they are not easy to sell for much at all. In general, the best thing to do is simply enjoy them for what they are, pretty pictures.
ReplyDeleteHi Chris-
ReplyDeleteI just came across a framed Currier and Ives in a box of things from my grandmother. In the left bottom corner beneath the picture it has in faint block letters "Published by Currier & Ives" and in the bottom far right corner it has 185 Nassau St New York. In block letters within a wide border it says Partridge Hunting. It is very old,(the frame has glass and the back is attached with tiny nails and a twisted wire to hang it) and is in good condition. Is there value to this print?
oops- I meant "Partridge Shooting"-
DeleteI have a print by N. Currier titled "Charlotte. of a lady seated.
ReplyDeleteAddress below is 2 Spruce St. NY NY
Wondering what period and possible value?
At a recent estate sale, I picked up a set of Currier & Ives "prints." Two were in a folder made from wood pulp paper, labeled "Currier & Ives," and there was a note included: "Here are your Currier & Ives prints which we know you will find most decorative in your home. These prints have been carefully reproduced from the originals..." The others were framed. Yesterday, I found another set in a shop, also in a Currier & Ives folder. A similar note was enclosed, but it said that the prints were made from the "original lithographs." So, are both sets reproductions? All appear to be on wood pulp paper. I scanned one and magnified it, and it doesn't have symmetrical pixilation like the example on the other page. If they are just reproductions, do you know which publishing company distributed prints in a folder like this, with the note inside? (Currier & Ives is the only publisher listed on the print itself.)
ReplyDeleteYes, both sets are reproductions. C&I prints were never issues in portfolios, tubes, envelopes or books. There are, however, lots of reproductions issued in all these formats. As to which company made those, I cannot say. There have probably been in the mid-hundreds of different companies who made C&I reproductions. No one has kept track of these and really it doesn't matter. The value of all C&I reproductions is "decorative." That is, they are worth what they look like as decorative items. They have no collector value.
DeleteHi, my name is Chris and I have 4 mugs which 2 are (Winter in the country “The old Grist Mill" From a lithographic print by Currier & Ives glass mugs) and 2 more that say (The old homestead in winter From a lithographic print by Currier & Ives glass mugs. I found them at an estate sale and I would so appreciate, and admire your expertise on how much they could be worth and the history about them. I appreciate you taking time out to check on this for I have checked on the Internet and just can’t get anywhere and I am hoping that maybe you could help me on this issue for I would be so grateful. My email address chrisbowdoin@yahoo.com I can also send some pics if necessary. Thanks so much again for your time, Chris
ReplyDeleteI have written above a number of times, though I suppose it doesn't hurt to say it again, but anything that is not a print is simply some sort of reproduction of a Currier & Ives. All reproductions, of any sort, are just that and they do not have any particular value from them copying Currier & Ives images. Your mugs may be nice, but their value is simply based on being mugs with pretty pictures on them. They have no collector value beyond that.
DeleteIn the list of comments I do not see any referring to civil war prints. Are these more rare. Also, were these prints ever folded originally because the one I have you can see a trace of folding in center. Also, the face of character in corner seems slightly different in style than others. Title is The Storming of Fort Donelson. Thank you
ReplyDeleteCivil War prints are no more rare than any of their topics. As the firm issued about 8,000 prints, there are many types of their prints which are not mentioned above.
DeleteThe C&I prints were never issued folded. That doesn't mean that yours might not have been folded later, but as these prints were often reproduced in books, it is likely your print is a reproduction.
I am not sure what you mean by your last comment, but I suspect you are talking about the face of General Grant, which was added based on a photograph, rather than the hand-drawn faces of all the other soldiers.
if a currier and ives print is copyrighted does that make it a reproduction? thanks
ReplyDeleteNo. Many of their prints were copyrighted.
ReplyDeleteWe have a framed print titled "Clipper Ship Flying Cloud". Image itself is 16 3/8" x 24" with title below, ships dimensions listed on left side and other specs on right side of title. Along the bottom of the print are small block text. At left is "E Brown, JR. DEL." Centered is "Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1852, by N. Currier in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Souther District of N.Y.". At right is "LITH BY N. CURRIER"
ReplyDeleteTrying to figure out whether this is an original. It is in a black stained oak frame with a yellowed paper backing that labeled 'Max Williams, 538 Madison Avenue, New York".
This is almost certainly a restrike of this print. Max Williams purchased six of the large folio clipper ship stones and reprinted the images. As your frame is labeled as being from that business, it is highly likely to be one of these restrikes.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for the info. Would be interested in learning more about the 'restrike' series that Max Williams produced. Would especially like to know what year it may have been reproduced, and how different it may be from an original. Are there any written resources that document Max Williams? Also curious how abundant these large folio Clipper Ship prints are, as might be interested in acquiring. A sister ship.
ReplyDeleteNot sure of the date, though 20th century. The difference is basically the paper (which is later) and the quality (which is not as good). They are "around," but not super common. A look on the internet or keeping an eye at auction might very well find you a companion.
ReplyDeleteI have 2 very old prints would like to get a price on them .......
ReplyDeleteI was researching whether a set of prints I bought long ago were originals when I came across your site. You have to be the most patient man in the print world: answering again and again the same questions when it's clear that posters haven't read through your previous answers. I kept on waiting for you to say something along the lines of, "Please read the previous 25 questions/answers carefully, then read them again, then one time after that. If you still think you may have original C&I prints after that, you may ask me a question!"
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment. You are right to the extent I really wish people would read my earlier replies, but I guess that is asking too much! In any case, I do love prints and love to help people with print questions, so on we go... Thanks for reading!
DeleteI have 2 prints. Inside the margins each print measures approx. 10" by 16"
ReplyDeleteThe only printed text is Currier & Ives bottom left just below the printed picture, and Winter Morning, centered below the printed picture.
The other is similar, Currier & Ives, bottom left and A Home in the Wilderness centered.
Each is on a fibre paper, appears to be hand colored. Any clues as to what these are?
I mean could these be reproductions because they do not have an address or any other text? Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThese are indeed reproductions. Any prints which just have "Currier & Ives" as an imprint are definitely reproductions.
DeleteCurrier & Ives is not the only text, each also has a title centered in the margin. What it does not have is a New York street address or an old-style copyright notice - "entered according to Act of Congress" and a date. I understood the latter two to not always be on the prints. Thank you.
DeleteWhat I said was "as an imprint," which is the information relative to printmakers, place, date, etc. The title is not part of the imprint. As I said, if the only imprint is "Currier & Ives" the print is a reproduction.
DeleteI have the American Homested Winter, Spring, Summer and Autum by Currier & Ives with the following information Published by Currier & Ives, Entered according to the act of congress , a year of 1836 or 1886 can not be sure. In New York, 125 Nassau ST, New York, 1886. I am trying to find someone to take a look at them to see what I really have. I am not sure where or when I get go Prin, but i think i picked them up at a thrift shop in VA a few years ago. Any help would be appreciated.
ReplyDeleteHi Mr.Lane
ReplyDeleteI have Two Horse Racing Lithographs That Has Academy Arts With The Address On Them.
The Imfor gives The Style For both #8253
Are They Qriginals Or Reproductions And When Were They Don't ( The Year)
Thanks A Bunch
Russ Scalf
These are reproductions. As we do not deal with reproductions, we are not familiar with when they would have been made.
DeleteI have a picture that says Currier & Ives on it and it is titled The four seasons of life. Childhood. It does not seem to fit the mold for the lithographs I have seen. For one it is only 4 x 3.5. I is printed with black and only has red coloring. It is very old, and it has glass over it with a black painted frame. Can anyone tell me anything about this picture?
ReplyDeleteThis is a reproduction. There are literally hundreds of different reproductions of this popular scene. Beyond that, there is really nothing more we can tell you as there are no records on all the companies which made these prints nor when they were done.
DeleteI have two pieces. One is the winters road and the other the gist. They are burnt etched in some kind of plastic. They look well done. Do you know anything about them?
ReplyDeleteNever mind I see another person had the same question. They listed it as a carving instead of a etching.
ReplyDeleteWhat can you tell me about a set of 8 6x8 currier and ives prints on linen?
ReplyDeleteAs explained in the blog, Currier & Ives issued only prints on paper. Any other use of their images, on wood, plastic, linen or whatever, is simply another company using their images to make something to sell to the public. Such items have been made since the beginning of the 20th century and are still made today.
DeleteHi
ReplyDeleteWe have a print from Currier & Ives that my great grandphater probably brought home to Norway from NY while sailing the sea.
The print is dated 1876 and shows the building to The equitable life assuance society of the united states. NO 120 Broadway. Bird wiew Manhattan, a very detailed and nice wiew.
The full title is:
The city of New York showing the building of
the equitable life assurance society of the united states
No 120 Broadway
copyright 1876. Currier&Ives N.Y. (This at the bottom right in the picture)
Size of the print is 54/85 cm or 21,2/33,3 inches measured only the picture itselves and not the margins around. There are no damages on the picture itselves, but there is a crack on the bottom margin on the white area. Also the print has not been framed in glass and the colours seems to have darkened.
We have looked up to try to verify if it is an original or not, and it might be an original. The paper thickness seems right according to descriptions of an original. And when we look closely with a magnifying glass the colours painted on the buildings seems original and not copy accoring to descriprion of an original.
The picutre is framed in a wooden frame with wood behind. It seems like it has been like this from the start as everything is very old.
Just wonder if this is a common picture from C&I as I do not find much about is. Also if you have any story around it would be fun and interesting. It is a very nice and big print with a lot of details from that century and a beautiful bird wiew over Manhattan.
Thanks a lot fo your help!
Best regards
Hege
Bergen, Norway
The size sounds right and so there is no reason to think that this is not an original. This is a typical C&I print; not particularly common nor particularly uncommon. It is listed in the Conningham book as #113. It is a very nice image with good detail of New York. Interestingly, there is a very similar image with the same title that is slightly larger. These prints were probably commissioned by the Life Assurance Society to use as advertising.
DeleteHi and thanks for a very quick answer. And thanks for information. Wonder if it is possible to make a copy of this picture for my very good friend that has done us great favour and I know love this picture. I am afraid the picture will get destroyed by the light from the copy machine or am I just a bit too hysterical :).
DeleteAlso, I have seen on the web similar pictures stated as original but date is 1883 or after the one we have from 1876. A bit confused with the definition of original :). How many of the same image is original from this print?
Also, the print is a bit dark. I have seen some restaurations of this, but will you recommend this kind of retauration and how is it done? Is it any place in Norway I can get this done without being afraid it will be broken?
Brgs
Hege
There is no reason you should not make a copy of the print. Yes, light can harm prints, but only prolonged exposure.
DeleteThe date on the print should be 1876. There are other similar views of NYC from different dates, but not one, I believe, with this exact title. As to how many examples of this image were printed, no one knows, but C&I always ran off thousands of their prints.
Restoration of a print like this can add to its value and certainly make it more attractive. We do not know any restoration companies in Norway. Sorry.
I have 3 framed Currier & Ives scenes but they are on a gold (metallic) paper....not sure if these are reproductions by some other company or did C&I print these lithographs on this type of paper?
ReplyDeleteC&I did not do prints like that. You have reproductions.
DeleteHi I have 2 prints the blood race and over the course of the union they are numbered, addressed, and also have the Donald art co. Is there any value?
ReplyDeleteThese are reproductions and have only what we call "decorative" value.
DeleteHi I have a Winter in the country the old grist mill currier and ives is a silver and gold plate. In reverse "the Danbury mint 1974 limited edition of 1700 handcrafted by Reed and Barton in its exclusive Damascene process 24 kt gold and copper on soild sterling silver nº 283 ¡do you can explain me how i look one like it in internet o maybe a catalog, somehow...thankyou very much
ReplyDeleteThis is not an original Currier & Ives. There are lots of different companies who have used the C&I images over time and that is what you have. I do not know of any place that has information on this particular copy.
DeleteI have 2 prints from Dufex prints. One has a Ref # 152762 and the other one Ref # 152748. I have them for over 20 years. Can you tell me if there are originals and if they have a collectors value?
ReplyDeleteThey ae not originals. They have only "decorative" value.
DeleteI just purchased small folio of The Old Oaken Bucket, C & I print. Trying to determine if it's orig. I have the Conningham book and dimensions are correct. It is unframed and my 2 questions are 1) I don't see an imprint in the paper from the lithographing stone ??? and 2) the hand coloring is not exactly the same as some other "Old Oaken Buckets" listed as originals. I would truly appreciate info on these 2 questions. I'm a neophyte C & I buyer trying to learn the ins and outs. Thanks! Gayle in San Diego
ReplyDeleteThere is no imprint left by a lithographic stone. Only intaglio prints (such as engravings) have a plate mark. The coloring was done by hand and these prints were issued over time, so there is always a variation in coloring. Of course, that doesn't mean it is an original, nor that the color is original, but variation in the color does not mean it is a reproduction.
ReplyDeleteColor me grateful...THANKS for those 2 answers which are very important to me.
DeleteGratefully, Gayle
Should I keep my 1952 "Courier & Ives' America" book intact, or cut the pages out and frame the pictures individually? (The pages of the book are in good condition (no tears or stains) but the book cover shows some wear and the book jacket is worn and torn in half.
ReplyDeleteWe're considering framing all the pics, keeping our favorites and selling the rest. Good or bad idea?
Note that the pictures in this book are reproductions. As such, their only value is decorative. There is really no way you could sell any of those pictures for any significant value. Also, the book is a nice one, but readily available on the market, so it too does not have a lot of value. So the question you ask really does not have an answer based on finances.
DeleteSo the question is whether you should keep a book in tact of cut it up for the pictures. In general I do not like to see books taken apart, but on the other hand your book is fairly common so it isn't really that bad a thing to do if you will enjoy the pictures you frame from it. They are nice images and if that will bring you more pleasure, I do not see why this isn't something that makes sense to do.
Thank you for your input. I agree it feels wrong to cut up a book. In book form we will rarely get to see our favorite pictures, while framed we could enjoy them all the time. We'll mull it over before deciding. Thanks again.
DeleteHi Chris, my sister-in-law purchased two prints years ago and we would appreciate your opinion if they are originals. The American Homestead Summer has the following: Entered according to act of Congress AD 1869, by currier and Ives, in the clerks office of the district court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the far corner:158 Nassau ST NY - The second print: The River Side - in the left hand corner PUBO BY CURRIER & IVES and in the right corner the address: 152 Nassau ST N Y. The prints appear to be professionally framed. Any information would be appreciated.
ReplyDeleteThe one that says "PUBO BY CURRIER & IVES" is a reproduction, as their prints never had this particular text. For the other there is no way I can tell you from the info you provided. How you can tell what you have is explained, to the best extent we can do so, on our web site.
DeleteI think it says "PUBD". This lithograph is listed in the Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2001703991/
DeleteI have what looks like a c1792 (The Express Train) in mirror image. The description matches C1793, except there are only 6 cars instead of 7. Is it possible they reversed the image in some way, or is is just a mistake in Conninghams's 1793 description?
ReplyDeleteConningham did make mistakes and I have not come across a C:1793 to know if it does have 6 or 7 cars. My guess is that rather than Conningham making a mistake either i) there is a variant not noted by Conningham or ii) yours might be some sort of reproduction. Without seeing it in person I cannot really say but all those possibilities are at least in play.
DeleteHi Chris, I have the four American Homestead prints- Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter, all framed. Each has some color but are not nearly as highly colored as some of the originals I've seen on your site, and some of the parts do not appear to be colored at all although original prints show color on these parts. Does this mean that they could not be originals? They are on thicker somewhat yellow-aged grainy paper and have all of the information stated exactly like the originals have on the bottom. Their sizes are about 5 1/2" by a bit less than 7 1/2".
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Meant to add that the sizes stated above are the entire piece of paper, and not merely the picture part. The picture part of each paper is about 3.75" by 6".
ReplyDeleteThese are much too small to be originals. They are some sort of reproduction
DeleteI've got a picture called "renaissance scenes" style 6516. Gold/velvet finish. 16x20. It was my grandpa's. Just want to know the history behind it. How old it is and if it's worth anything. Thanks
ReplyDeleteI have a Currier and Ives lithograph titled Frankie and Tip on bottom it says New York published by Currier and Ives 125 Nassau St. Is it original ? What might value be?
ReplyDeleteI have 2 Currier & Ives that I can't seem to find any information on them..One is The Angel Gabriel and the other is The Crucifixion..Both are published by Currier & Ives and has the address of 115 Nassau st, New York on them...any information would be appreciated
ReplyDeleteI have a very small folio print Trotting at the Cracks Forge mounted in a narrow federal hall, foyer frame the print has all the markings of the original it's not a repro from what I can tell it's published by Burrier & Ives the address is 182 Nassau st, New York it;s size in the frame above the mirror is 6 5/8" x 8 5/8".
ReplyDeleteI have searched all over to get a value for this lithograph and it's old mirror frame can you help me?
Kip
kip@adworksct.com
thank you.
This may be old, but it is not an original Currier & Ives print. They did not issue this image in this size. Value would probably come from the whole package (i.e. mirror and print) not from the print itself.
DeleteI have a "Currier & Ives' America" book that has "80 Choice Prints In Full Color" by Colin Simkin. The book is in fair to good condition, as far as the covers and spine are concerned. It is missing the very first page (frontispiece?), but all others appear to be intact. I'm wondering if it would be okay to split this book up into separate prints, or should I keep it together?
ReplyDeleteIf a book is in perfect condition, there is a general feeling that it shouldn't be broken up, but this is not that rare a book so it wouldn't really be that bad even if the book were perfect. Given that it is already "incomplete" I see not reason you shouldn't take it apart and enjoy the prints individually. Do note, however, that the prints do not have any real value. They are decorative reproductions, so can be attractive, but are not really collectible.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI bought a Currier & Ives Print and am trying to identify if it is original. The name is "The Four Seasons Of Life : Childhood.
ReplyDeleteand below that The seson of joy.
Does anyone know the value of an original lithograph by Currier 1852 "Mrs. Fish and the Misses Fox?" It appears to be a super rare and very historic lithograph of great subject matter. The only place that I can find one is at The Library Of Congress and this includes researching many, many auctions on line combined with no available Google images other than The Library Of Congress.
ReplyDeleteI do not give out values in this blog, as it is supposed to be non-commercial, but I can make a few comments. First, your experience looking for the print at auction does not necessarily mean that the print is super rare. Though the history of these women is really very interesting, it is not a topic that generates a lot of general knowledge nor interest. That means that this is not the type of print that would bring significant money nor would likely come up at a lot of auctions. Remember that the firm did probably 8,000 or so prints and really only a fairly small percentage of those get up at auction. I do not think this print is common (I have only seen it in a collection once), but nor do I think it is that particularly rare compared to many C&I prints. As I indicated, I also do not think it would bring a lot of money at auction. There are a fair number of C&I collectors, but they generally collect prints of particular subjects and I doubt that theme of many collections would include this print. This is a very interesting and unusual print, and I think it would do "ok" at auction, but not (in my opinion, of course) that large a price.
DeleteHi Chris,
ReplyDeleteI have a lithograph titled "Beautiful Dreamer" address 115 Nassau St. It's in a very old frame and has a page from a newspaper dated 1889 under the back frame piece so I believe it's authentic. Could you tell me the history of this piece? Is it rare?
For the majority of C&I prints, including yours, there is really nothing particular to say beyond the general history of the firm (which you can read about more in the blog). Most of their prints were issued for the same reason, to be framed and hung in the home for decoration. Your print is a typical C&I print; all their prints are rare--for they are pieces of paper over 100 years old--but this print is not particularly rare. It is, in sum, a nice example of the output of America's printmakers.
DeleteThank you, it's a lovely piece. I found it tossed out on the side of the road as trash and couldn't leave it there.
ReplyDelete03/20/2015
ReplyDeleteI purchased I believe to be a print. It says Spring Mill by Currier and Ives #1 out of 930. I am unable to find any information on this print it has Published by Currier and Ives left below corner of picture. 152 Nassau St. New York, N.Y. on right corner SPRING MILL. in center. Barely can see 1973 Scafa Tornabene Art Publ. Co., N.Y. No. 1-930 can anyone help me identify this picture
This is a reproduction of a Currier & Ives print by the Scafa Tornabene Art Publishing company. Done in the 20th century. It is not 1 out of 930, but rather the "No. 1-930" is their catalogue number.
DeleteHi Mr. Lane,
ReplyDeleteI have purchased a plate of Currier & Ives. Can you please advise on whether it's authentic or reproduction, here's what's on it:
The
Currier & Ives
Plate Collection
American Homestead - Summer
Currier & Ives . 1869
Warning
For Decoration purpose only
Not to be used for serving foods
Made in Japan
Hi. I have a small lithograph of American Country Living "Summers Evening" by n.currier 1855 lithograph framed in great condition from "the collections of harry t.Peters New York Musuem". Could this print be original and of any value from this collection? Ives name is not mentioned.
ReplyDeleteAny of the prints which are from the Peters collection are reproductions. They have only "decorative" value.
ReplyDeleteI have a friend that has "The River Side" uncolored copy with a nice dark antique looking frame that says Published by Currier and Ives on left and 152 Nassau St N.Y. On the right bottom? More than likely a reproduction? Safe to take it out of the frame? I found the color print on-line but none of a uncolored copy after hours of looking. Tony Steele 859 285 3910
ReplyDeleteIt is always safe to take a print out of a frame, whether original or not, as long as you are careful. Some prints were issued both colored and uncolored, so the mere fact it is uncolored does not mean it is not an original, though that makes it somewhat likely. Size, process and paper are the ways to tell.
ReplyDeleteI have a vintage currier & Ives Trotters print that is pre-1972 as it has provinance that says it was "reframed" in October 1963. It is a lithograph of the race with Miller's Damsel and has the times and places listed at the bottom which the 1972 prints do not. Do you know anything about it?
ReplyDeletei HAVE A GOLD ETCHING IN WHITE PAPER WITH A CURRIER AND IVES BLACK AND WHITE PRINT UNDERNEATH WITH SIGNATURE ETCHED INTO THE GOLD LEAF COATING. IS IT ORIGINAL?
ReplyDeleteNo. Nothing like that was ever issued by Currier & Ives. All their prints are lithographs (mostly colored) on regular paper.
DeleteMy Uncle's last assignment as a Master Printer at Travelers was the reprinting of The Story of the American Revolution by Currier & Ives, in 1976. He gave his set, in the original envelope as a present because he knew I liked/studied US History. They have been in the same envelope along with the interior since 1976, and never displayed. Are they of any value? Just curious, Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThe size of the image should be 13 1/2 x 9 3/4.
ReplyDeleteI am not sure what information you are looking for. There really isn't anything more to say about it than what it is (masonic chart) and who made it (Currier & Ives). They issued lots of charts and certificates like that which were used by the intended audience (Masons in this case) for gifts, to hang in the temples, or for home, etc. etc. If you read more about C&I and their history, that will tell you something, but I really cannot think what ever you want to know (value, yes you can get an appraisal, but I would not recommend it as this is not a paritcularly valuable print--in line with other prints by the firm of that size). Note also that it is also not that rare, but is not one which a lot of collectors are looking for so it doesn't get 'written up' that much. Remember C&I issued over 8,000 different prints and only a few of them have much written about them.
ReplyDeleteI just purchased an Autumn scene from the American Homestead collection. It is framed, very old and printed in black and white.
ReplyDeleteI have never seen any from this collection in black and white and I cannot find any info on it. Thank you.
DeleteI do not believe that this series was ever issued by Currier & Ives uncolored. Every B&W example of one of the American Homestead series I have seen have all been reproductions, so I am afraid that is almost certainly what you have.
DeleteI have a small folio N. Currier lithograph which appears to be from the late 1830’s. I have not been able to find a reference to this particular piece anywhere. It is titled “The Scales of Justice”, and portrays a monkey holding scales of justice and confronting two cats with a pitcher, a saucer of milk, an overturned bottle and broken candle between them. The monkey wears what appears to be a judge’s cap and is sitting on a low foot stool. The colors are black and white, with a touch of blue and a light red.
ReplyDeleteA subtitle below the main reads:
“When people go to law about an uncertain title, and have spent their whole estates in the contest, nothing is more common than for some little pettifogging attorney to step in, and secure it to himself (Asop’s Fables)” Note the spelling of Asop’s.
A dialogue balloon from one cat reads “We are satisfied, let us cut the cheese.” A response from the monkey reads “If you are satisfied, justice is not.”
The identification and address on the lithograph read: “Lith & Pub by N. Currier” and “152 Nassau St Cor of Spruce N.Y.”
I would very much appreciate any information you might be able to supply regarding this item, and where I might have it appraised.
As I write in this blog, there is really little to say about most Currier or Currier & Ives prints other than the date, title and that sort of thing. Your print is listed in Conningham's book of C&I prints as number 5407. It is undated, but the address indicates it was issued between 1838-56, probably over a number of years. In terms of having it appraised, there are a number of shops which do this, including The Philadelphia Print Shop West.
DeleteI have a print. It is in an old frame and the glass is definately rolled glass. There us printing at the bottom. "lith & pub by N currier 152 nassau st. cor spruce N.Y." There is a scene of the Last Supper about 1/3 of the way down the print and it takes up about 25 to 33% of the print around which is printed The Lord's Prayer in various fonts or styles of writing. I have searched everywhere and can't find anything about it. Anything you know would be useful.
ReplyDeleteThis is probably the print listed in Conningham as #3774, though it might be a variant. Currier issued literally hundreds of different religious prints, which were sold inexpensively to the general public and hung in many homes in the middle of the nineteenth century. There really isn't anything to say about them other than the general information about Currier's prints, but they are all great examples of mid-nineteenth century "popular prints."
DeleteI see where you say above that Currier and Ives only printed on linen, but I have something strange. An old, fairly wealthy friend died recently and I acquired his The Railroad Suspension Bridge Near Niagara Falls. He believed it to be valuable. I originally thought it might be reversed painted on glass, as the image is stuck to the glass but is quite clear (if a bit faded from some images I have seen). It is backed by linen, but the image itself is on only perhaps the thinnest of paper stock, and that is what I don’t understand. I thought it might be the original painting from which the lithograph was made, but there is just enough border to show the copyright registration and the name of the artist. Any ideas?
ReplyDeletep.s. The Roebling bridge image is 10 1/4" by 15 1/4"
DeleteActually, Currier & Ives mostly printed on paper, though I have seen some on linen. It sounds like yours is a standard print, but backed onto linen, perhaps by the company or perhaps by the owner. C&I prints were commercial prints, which were treated in all sorts of strange ways over time. This is not typical, but it doesn't sound unlikely.
DeleteThanks. [I meant to say "never" not "only" on linen; but you managed to answer my question anyway.] What's weird is that the image is almost a film on glass, no paper; and appears to be protected by the linen.
Deletehello, i have purchased quite a few Lithographs from a yard sale about 25 years ago. Quite a few are C&I Lithographs,.. New York The Bettmann Archives and I wanted to inquire the value of these. I have the American homestead four seasons, also The Nip & Tuck Race , Together at the first turn and The humming trot. Also , the first trot of the season and all of these are in multiples. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteI have a large folio Currier & Ives print entitled "The Express Train" I realize that there are many reproductions of the Train prints so trying to do all that I can to establish authenticity. This print is from an estate in which there already have been two authentic small prints found....Maple Sugaring and American Railroad Scene Snowbound. Both of these prints also had reputable dealers labels on back (the Old Print Shop and Kennedy Galleries). This large print however appears to have been framed in the 1970s-80s. I have removed it from the frame and have found several large repairs (tears that have been repainted and the print appears to have been dry mounted to better secure it. Certainly it appears to have been hand colored and the stone lithograph evident rather than dot matrix. The image and markings across the bottom match the print in the Metropolitan Art Museum Archives (accession number 63.550.62 Beguest of Adele S. Colgate, 1962). Artist notated on bottom left is Chas Parsons. Currier & Ives Lith N.Y on right . Entered ....1858.by Currier & Ives. Tilte is The Express Train. Under that is New York, Published by Currier & Ives, 152 Nassau St. The exact size of the image of my print is 25 13/16 wide by 17 15/16. The paper is toned both form age and also toned along an edge showing that was at one time in a smaller frame cutting off the address lie at the bottom. The margins around the print make it 21 1/4 tall by 29 inches wide . The paper surface appears to be a wove stock. Considering all of this do you believe it to be authentic?
ReplyDeleteI have the four season hanging platesI bought in 1972.
ReplyDeleteChris, one of their prints, "Home to Thanksgiving", in every description I've found out there says in the right hand corner "reproduced in 4 color aquatone...". Do you have any additional information on this one? Was it commissioned, etc? This seems to be the only "authorized" repro out there? Normally in all the guides, they say to watch out for any references to "Reproduced by", "commissioned by", "from the collection of", etc. Lastly, are Currier and Ives actually still in demand? It seems that they're everywhere, reproduced and original.
ReplyDeleteThere is no such thing as an "authorized" C&I reproduction. There is no copyright on their images so anyone can reproduce them. The print with "reproduced in 4 color aquatone" is just one of the many different reproductions of this great image. The only value difference between reproductions is quality. All reproductions have only "decorative" value, but as some are more decorative than others, they are worth more.
ReplyDeleteOriginal C&I prints are certainly still in demand. While reproductions are out there everywhere, the originals are quite rare and very collectible.
Thanks Chris, do you have a source for the original Home to Thanksgiving? As mentioned, Google seems to have the aquatone mainly, even the ones that appear in museum collections. eBay, Craigslist and a lot of antique shops here in MD seem to have a lot of them, for various prices. I've collected probably 200 or so, some I bought knowing they were repros (liked the subject matter) and some I took a shot in the dark. Based on all my research, using a lot of different sites Philly print shop and others, I would estimate that 70-85 of my collection are originals. Also on the value, I have a "Washington as a Mason" and took it to Marylands version of the antique roadshow. The gentleman remarked that C&I have lost considerable value but did offer to buy it.. thanks again for the info!
DeleteHi, I picked up a Currier print at a sale this weekend. The print is of EMMA. She is in a white dress with the Indian print behind her. There is a small 2" opening in the print at the top. It is right where the wood back panel meet on the back. I believe the olk frame is original with mortise join. It has wood panels on the back. My question to you is ok to remove the wood back and put acid free paper behind it.
ReplyDeletePlus I could clean the back of the glass. What is the best way too maintain this print.
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks
Margie
It is actually very important that you remove the wood backing. This is typically how C&I prints were framed and the wood backing is very bad for the print (it contains acid). You can keep it (it really has no value), but the only thing that should be in contact with the print is something that is non-acidic (like a rag backing board). Also, definitely feel free to clean the glass!
DeleteWould there be any interest to collectors for a large ceramic milk can with American Summer Homestead on the side?
ReplyDeleteNo particularly from C&I collectors. As noted above, none of the objects with C&I images have any really to do with Currier & Ives, beyond what a plate with the Mona Lisa on it has to do with da Vinci. That doesn't mean they are not nice, but they are not of particular interest to C&I collectors, who are interested in the original prints issued by the firm.
ReplyDeleteCan you give me any info regarding a print said to be original by my grandmother. It was her grandmother's (puts her alive circa 1850s?). It is With Malice Toward None and Charity For All, framed in wood with porcelain "dots" or "pebbles" all around the frame. Curious to know its backstory.
ReplyDeleteThis sounds like a typical C&I 'motto' print. They created prints on any topic that they thought would sell, and this included various sayings on religious, moral or patriotic topics. People would buy these to frame and hang in their homes for 'moral' education.
DeleteVery neat. The print I have is on thick paper, almost like a thin cardboard. It's framed but the actual paper is torn on the sides and I'm able to examine it. Very cool stuff. Since this was a lincoln quote, I hope that means my grandma was on the right side of history ;). She lived in Indiana in the mid-late 1800s. Bottom left side says " New York published by Currier & Ives 125 Nassau St." and the right bottom reads "Copyright, 1875 by Currier & Ives NY" ...any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
DeleteIt is hard to tell if it is an original without seeing it in person, but I do not remember seeing a reproduction of this print, so there is at least a reasonable chance it is an original.
ReplyDeleteThat's so neat. I wondered if there was a date which reprints began? I know about the time period my great great grandma owned it...I wondered if that would help give me a clue. Assuming it's an original, would this have been expensive at the time?
ReplyDeleteThey have been making reproductions ever since the late 19th century. The original prints would not have been very expensive even into the beginning of the 20th century.
DeleteThanks for the info!
ReplyDeleteI am not looking to sell in as much as I'm looking for this authenticity. I believe my grandparents framed hand colored 1871 Quail print (below Quail it says Virginia Partridge) is original. It does NOT say Currier and Ives. It only says "Entered according to the act of Congress in the year 1871" and "In the office of the Librarian Congress at Washington" I have seen black and white but I have yet to see a hand colored one like this one. Our grandparents were antique collectors. It still has the wood backing. Any advice? Thank you in advance. jsvicary@aol.com
ReplyDeleteIn all likelihood, your print is not a Currier & Ives. Their prints had their names on it (if you look on-line you will see that). It could be a reproduction or it simply could be a copy of the image by another publisher (that sort of thing happened all the time). In the end, the only way to tell if it is an original antique is to see if the paper is from that period and to see if it is a lithograph.
ReplyDeleteAs for the color, the fact that you do not find a copy on-line with color means nothing other than that no one has put on up. C&I prints were all printed in b&w and the many were hand colored afterwards. Many of their prints appeared in both format.
I found 2 very old reproduction prints approx 18"x13" on 1/8" paper stock. Almost a cardboard type material. I know they are ore 1950's based on professional framing. They have all original language on prints. One is "A HOME ON THE MISSISSIPPI" and the other is "THE OLD OAKEN BUCKET" (the 1864 version). Any idea who may have printed these? I could not find any going back 25 years after hours of looking at different search sites we have. Great looking works, just not sure of age or maker. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThe above prints were professionally framed and backed by a noted art company in Indianapolis. Actually redone more than once. My guess is first framing was 1930's or so, the second was 1950's.
ReplyDeleteWe have a large framed C&I clipper ship. It has no name. Did they always name their prints? It says 1983 way at the bottom.
ReplyDeleteI have an entire 8 portfolio set of the Currier and Ives Stencil Hand Colored Engravings for the People of the Civil War. They are old. How old? The bottom left says Published by Currier and Ives. The bottom right says 152 Nassau St. New York. Each has a title etc. Each one measures 15" x 11". Each set of six is in its own folio. What are they worth?
ReplyDelete